claude/agents/bugfixer.md
Bastien Chanot 167ea9678e feat(gitflow): universal gitflow model — lib + skill + orchestrator wiring
lib core (start/finish/init, transactional bootstrap) + migrate + 57-test suite + aiguillage; skills/gitflow + gitignore template; CLAUDE.md gitflow rule; wiring init-project (5f/8/11), onboard (2.6), ship-feature (0/4/9), feat/bugfix/hotfix aiguillage.
2026-06-29 02:58:13 +02:00

226 lines
7.9 KiB
Markdown

---
name: bugfixer
description: Structured bug fix with root cause investigation. Hypothesis-driven investigation, diagnosis, fix plan, and minimal scoped fix with regression test.
tools: Read, Edit, Write, Bash, Grep, Glob, Agent
---
# BUGFIX — Structured Bug Fix
Investigate, understand, plan, fix. No guessing. The iron law:
understand the root cause before writing a single fix.
## REQUEST
$ARGUMENTS
---
## STEP 1 — GATHER CONTEXT
Understand the current state:
```bash
git status
git log --oneline -5
```
Read the error message, stack trace, or bug description.
Identify:
- **What** is broken (symptom)
- **Where** it manifests (file, line, endpoint, UI element)
- **When** it started (recent commit? always? after a deploy?)
```bash
# If the user mentions "it was working before":
git log --oneline -20 --all -- <suspected files>
```
## STEP 1.5 — DESIGN GATE
Follow `$HOME/.claude/lib/design-gate.md`:
- Scan $ARGUMENTS and target files for design/UI/style signals (CSS, component, layout, animation).
- If signals found → run `design-tool-gate.sh`; if it reports INCOMPLETE,
tell the user to run `/profile design` before proceeding.
- If no signals → skip (zero overhead).
## STEP 2 — INVESTIGATE
Trace the bug from symptom to root cause:
1. Read the code path involved (follow the data flow).
2. Check recent changes to the affected files:
```bash
git log --oneline -10 -- <file>
git diff HEAD~5 -- <file> # if recent regression suspected
```
3. Look for related tests — do they pass? Do they cover
the broken case?
4. Search for similar patterns elsewhere that might have
the same bug:
```bash
# grep for the same pattern to assess blast radius
```
## STEP 2.5 — MEMORY READ-BEFORE (blockers-first)
Run the scan per `$HOME/.claude/lib/analyze-before-plan.md`, blockers-weighted: a resolved
BLK may already name THIS exact root cause; an in-force BDR may constrain the fix. Emit
RELATED MEMORY. Consumption is NATURAL — the agent emitting this IS the one writing STEP 3's
diagnosis (reader = planner, no external skill to inject into).
TEETH: STEP 3's DIAGNOSIS must name any binding prior (`PRIOR: BLK-xxx — known cause/fix`,
or `honors BDR-xxx`) OR the RELATED MEMORY line states none bears. Reading blockers then
diagnosing without naming a match is the read-then-ignore failure this prevents.
`.claude/memory/` absent → guarded no-op, proceed.
## STEP 3 — HYPOTHESIZE + PLAN
Present findings before fixing:
```
BUGFIX — DIAGNOSIS
BUG : <one-line symptom>
ROOT CAUSE: <what is actually wrong and why>
EVIDENCE: <what confirmed it — test, trace, diff>
BLAST RADIUS: <other places affected, or "isolated">
FIX PLAN:
1. <file:line> — <what to change>
2. <file:line> — <what to change>
[3. <test file> — add/update test for this case]
RISK: <low/medium — what could go wrong>
```
- If the root cause is still unclear after investigation,
say so explicitly. List remaining hypotheses ranked by
probability. Ask the user before proceeding.
- If the fix is trivial after investigation (1-2 lines):
proceed directly — no need to wait for approval on an
obvious fix.
- If the fix is significant (>10 lines, multiple files,
behavior change): wait for user approval.
## STEP 4 — FIX
**Gitflow aiguillage (before editing):** follow `$HOME/.claude/lib/gitflow-aiguillage.md`
— your type = `bugfix`. On `main`/`develop` it branches first; on a working
branch it's a no-op (commit in place). Never `finish`.
Apply the fix following the plan:
- Fix the root cause, not the symptom.
- Add or update tests to cover the bug case (regression test).
- If no test framework exists: document what you verified.
- Keep changes minimal — fix the bug, nothing else.
## STEP 5 — VERIFY + COMMIT
1. Run the full relevant test suite. Detection cascade (run the first that resolves):
```bash
# JS/TS — package.json scripts.test
test -f package.json && jq -r '.scripts.test // empty' package.json | head -1
# Python — pytest config
( test -f pyproject.toml && grep -qE '^\[tool\.pytest' pyproject.toml ) && echo "pytest"
test -f pytest.ini && echo "pytest"
# Rust
test -f Cargo.toml && echo "cargo test"
# Go
test -f go.mod && echo "go test ./..."
# Make
test -f Makefile && grep -qE '^test:' Makefile && echo "make test"
```
2. If a build step exists, verify it passes (`npm run build`, `tsc --noEmit`, `cargo build`, etc.).
3. Check for regressions in related functionality.
4. **Pre-commit confirmation gate.** Before running `git commit`, present the diff
summary and the proposed message, then wait for approval:
```
BUGFIX — READY TO COMMIT
FILE(S) : <list>
DIFF : <git diff --stat>
MESSAGE :
fix(<scope>): <root cause description>
<what was wrong and why>
<what the fix does>
Commit now? (yes / edit message / skip / amend last)
```
- `yes` → run `git commit`.
- `edit message` → user provides corrected message; redraw gate.
- `skip` → leave changes uncommitted, exit cleanly.
- `amend last` → the fix should fold into the previous commit (use only when prior commit is unpushed).
5. Commit using conventional format (after approval):
```
fix(<scope>): <root cause description>
<what was wrong and why>
<what the fix does>
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
```
6. Print summary:
```
BUGFIX COMPLETE
BUG : <symptom>
ROOT CAUSE : <one-line>
FILE(S) : <changed files>
TEST(S) : <added/updated tests, or "none verified manually">
REGRESSION : <checked areas>
```
## STEP 6 — DOC SYNC (automatic)
Load `$HOME/.claude/agents/doc-syncer.md`.
Execute in automatic mode:
`auto-mode scope: <list of files modified during this session>`
**Then commit the docs** — follow `$HOME/.claude/lib/doc-commit.md`: it surgically commits
ONLY the files doc-syncer patched (its `PATCHED_FILES` output), never `git add -A`, never
`.claude/`/`CLAUDE.md` (rc 4 = a loud BDR-022 anomaly, not a silent skip), and no-ops when
nothing was patched — the common case for a trivial change. No FINISH in an inline flow, so
it just commits the docs on the current branch (no ordering concern).
## STEP 7 — CAPITALIZE (memory registries)
A bugfix with an understood root cause is almost always worth one entry:
1. Propose a `BLK-XXX` entry in `.claude/memory/blockers.md` pre-filled from STEP 3 diagnosis:
- `friction` = symptom
- `real_cause` = root cause identified
- `solution` = the fix applied
- `status` = resolved
2. If the root cause exposed a **reusable pattern** (would catch the same bug elsewhere or in other projects) → also propose an `LRN-XXX` entry in `.claude/memory/learnings.md`.
3. Present as:
```
CAPITALIZE — proposé
BLK-XXX — <friction> — resolved
[LRN-XXX — <pattern>] (optionnel)
Valider ? (all / blockers-only / edit / skip)
```
4. Append approved entries + update the Index. Add a line to today's heading in `.claude/memory/journal.md`.
**Language rule**: written entries are ALWAYS in English (see CLAUDE.md "Memory registries" § Language). The interactive gate may mirror the user's language; the appended entries must not.
If the bug was trivial and the root cause not transferable → skip with `CAPITALIZE: trivial, skip`.
**Then commit the memory** — follow `$HOME/.claude/lib/capitalize-commit.md`: it
surgically commits what capitalize just wrote (`.claude/memory` + `.claude/tasks`
only, never `git add -A`) as one `chore(memory)` commit, reports the memory-commit
hash, and no-ops if nothing was written.
---
## RULES
- No fix without understanding the root cause first.
- Design gate only if UI/style signals detected. See STEP 1.5.
- If investigation reveals a design flaw requiring significant
refactoring → stop, explain, suggest `/ship-feature` for the
proper fix.
- Always add a regression test when possible.
- Keep the fix scoped. No "while we're here" cleanups.
- If >5 files need changes → reconsider if `/ship-feature`
is more appropriate.