chore(memory): LRN-118 — gitflow-conformity audit (commits-code vs applies-defers discriminator + phantom-ref/dry-run-both-sides discipline)

2026-07-09 11:33:51 +02:00
parent 9d9c55e87c
commit 2533e10ccb
1 changed files with 8 additions and 0 deletions
@@ -1188,3 +1188,11 @@ rules:
 - **fix**: at release-finish / in /reconcile, list `develop..release/*` commits touching functional files (exclude merges, `.claude/**`, version.txt/CHANGELOG) and present them for back-merge review. Advisory, NOT a hard make-test gate — cherry-picks land with new SHAs so the source commit stays in the range; automatic "already-ported?" equivalence is unreliable and would false-positive. Backlogged.
 - **future application**: any long-lived fork (release/*, long feature) — audit CODE divergence, not just declared/registry state ([[LRN-034]] narrated ≠ ground truth, applied to branches).
 - **cousin**: [[LRN-116]] (a resolved blocker's fix can be missing from develop), [[BDR-054]] (supersession-trace discipline).
 ## LRN-118 — Gitflow-conformity audit: "commits-code" vs "applies-but-defers-commit" is the line that sorts real findings from false positives
 - **pattern**: audited 52 units (33 skills + 19 agents) for gitflow conformity. Raw git-signal grep over-flags: `git add -A`, `gitflow finish`, `--no-verify` mostly appear inside PROHIBITION tables ("never …"), not usages — reading context killed every one (harden/web-validate `--no-verify` = bans; capitalize `git add -A` = ban; tour `gitflow finish` ×3 = red-flags). The decisive discriminator was NOT "does it write code?" but "does it autonomously `git commit`/`push`?": seo/geo/harden/web-validate/code-clean/refactor/doc all EDIT code/public-doc yet defer the commit to the human (or have NO `git commit` path at all) → safe by construction, gitflow layer N/A. Only 2 units both wrote AND committed without a branch precondition: commit-change (commits code, no aiguillage) and client-handover (autonomous `git push`). 0 MERGES-ALONE, 0 BYPASSES-HOOK.
 - **why it matters**: a conformity audit that classifies on "writes code" drowns in false positives; classify on "reaches an autonomous commit/push" and the surface collapses to the few units that can actually corrupt a branch. Thin-dispatcher skills (20-line SKILL.md → agent + commit lib) must be judged as skill+agent+lib triples — the discipline lives in the agent/lib (e.g. /doc's gitflow layer is in doc-syncer + doc-commit.sh, not SKILL.md).
 - **the net**: empirically the per-repo pre-commit hook BLOCKS a non-`.claude/` code commit on main/develop (exit 1), exempts `.claude/**`, allows working branches; `--no-verify` bypasses it client-side → Gitea server-side branch protection is the real backstop. So the 2 findings fail LOUD (hook), never corrupt develop — remediation = make them branch cleanly first (aiguillage / GO-gated push), not incident-urgent.
 - **fix applied**: commit-change got Phase 0 = the shared `gitflow-aiguillage.md` (TYPE=chore, branch on protected base, no-op on working) + report-only fallback; client-handover push gated behind explicit-GO AskUserQuestion + report-only fallback. Dry-runs proved BOTH sides of each fallback (branch-taken AND not-taken), not just the happy path.
 - **future application**: any fleet/skill conformity audit — (1) triage by "autonomous commit/push reached?", not "file written?"; (2) read every git-signal in context (prohibition vs usage); (3) test the deterministic backstop empirically before trusting it; (4) verify a referenced lib exists + its contract matches BEFORE copying it (phantom-reference guard); (5) dry-run both branches of every fallback.
 - **cousin**: [[LRN-117]] (orphaned CODE has no sequence to check), [[LRN-034]] (narrated ≠ ground truth), [[BDR-061]] (report-only agent tool-grants).