chore(memory): BDR-070..073 LRN-131..133 BLK-017 EVAL-025 — capitalize

.claude/memory/evals.md

@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ rules:
 | EVAL-013 | 2026-06-30 | /reconcile real-usage on live repo: known gap + 2 unanticipated (header-marker drift class) + false-positive rejected off-fixture, 0 false assertion | keep |
 | EVAL-018 | 2026-07-06 | job3 docs-drift audit + execution: 46/46 findings verified, 20/23 fixes shipped (B1 blocked, D2-D5+B6 skipped by decision), zero residual on re-sweep | keep |
 | EVAL-019 | 2026-07-06 | job4 test-gap audit + execution: 11 specs + 5 fixes/seams, every mutation red-green verified, zero residual | keep |
+| EVAL-025 | 2026-07-17 | opening seo/geo inventory (subagents): 7/7 verifiable claims false or overstated; real contact corrected all, 6 plan corrections + 4 features killed at measurement | keep |
 
 ---
 
@@ -241,3 +242,9 @@ rules:
   - **A2 (tooling, FALSE POSITIVE)**: security-guidance automated review flagged the same file, HIGH "Agent/Subprocess Permission Bypass", fix = restore the inert `Write()` rules. Wrong — would re-introduce the bug + the 15 startup warnings. Pattern-matched "deny line removed = bypass" with zero knowledge of rule-matching semantics. Rejected with doc citations.
   - **A3 (subagent, caught)**: claude-code-guide asserted `**/*.lock` matches `package-lock.json`. False (ends `.json`). Caught on read → `package-lock.json`/`pnpm-lock.yaml`/`go.sum` got explicit rules. Don't trust delegated glob reasoning.
 - **action**: keep — fix landed (07ca738), weakening reverted. Lesson: vague delegation ("je te laisse en juger") authorizes ADDING protection, never REMOVING it; a boundary-loosening edit needs its own explicit ask, doubly so when the boundary is mine. Guardrail signal: the deterministic classifier beat both the LLM reviewer (A2 false pos) and me (A1) — keep it loud. Linked to [[BDR-069]], [[LRN-130]].
+
+## EVAL-025 — opening seo/geo inventory (subagent-produced) that founded the 20-point plan — 2026-07-17
+- **output**: the inventory + claude-seo comparison report from 3 Explore subagents, on which the entire seo-geo-integrity plan was built.
+- **method**: each verifiable claim confronted DURING execution with a primary source or a live test — CrUX API metric list, web.dev, Search Console API reference, HEAD on data.commoncrawl.org, real curl on 2 live sites (zenquality Astro, lavageangels356 native PHP), 2 real repos.
+- **anomalies**: 7/7 of the verifiable claims were false or overstated (VSI exists / Off-page zero-data / stats drive weights / GSC Links API / SPA §0 flag / Twitter 403 / Common Crawl viable). 6 plan corrections mid-execution: I1 over-correction, I6 wrong framing, W1 wrong shape (verb vs extend), C1a false premise (grep already skips gitignore), C1b needless guard, B1 non-viable at 17.3 GB. The REAL corrected every time; re-reading the spec never did.
+- **action**: keep — see [[LRN-132]]. 4 features killed at measurement (B1/B2/B3 + W2 deferred) beat 4 false-signal features. The most trustworthy output of the session was the code NOT written. Method that worked: show/measure the real artifact before deciding, mirroring [[LRN-074]]'s watch-the-RED discipline applied to a plan.