bchanot/claude
1
0
Fork 1
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

chore(memory): BDR-051 enrich-at-gate + LRN-096 flip-test-guards + journal lot 5 (chantier complete)

Browse Source 
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01XpphkdTosUzokBDNG7PToS
This commit is contained in:
Bastien Chanot
2026-07-04 04:52:55 +02:00
co-authored by Claude Opus 4.8
parent 1c69de2f40
commit b99ace29c0
3 changed files with 18 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
.claude/memory/journal.md
+1
View File
@@ -319,3 +319,4 @@ rules:
- Chantier verify-loops LOT 3 (feature/security-auditor `2b297bd`): agents/security-auditor.md (SAST gate, pinned p/security-audit+p/secrets+p/owasp-top-ten, secrets→CRITICAL, block ERROR only, DEGRADED-still-checks, anti-gaming nosemgrep, PROOF-or-fail) + grafts onboard L3a (complement to cso, both gstack branches) + audit-delta security axis. 28 structure locks + 4 behavioral dogfoods green: vuln→BLOCK(9), nosemgrep→BLOCK(1), DEGRADED→BLOCK(7). owasp REQUIRED (measured: baseline misses SQLi+path-traversal on Flask). [[LRN-094]] + [[BDR-048]] addendum (owasp/severity/FP) applied at integration on feature/verify-loops (index drift LRN-090/091 backfilled same pass). Next: lot 4 loops-light (feat/bugfix/hotfix wiring).
- Integration: feature/verify-loops = develop + merge lots 1-3 (local, develop/main intact, nothing pushed) so lots 4-5 wiring is dogfoodable against present agents. Memory stack-conflicts resolved (BDR-048/049, LRN-092/093/094 stacked ID-order; BDR-048 addendum applied; LRN-090/091 index rows backfilled).
- Chantier verify-loops LOT 4 (feature/verify-loops `0f0162d`): lib/verify-secure-loop.md shared include + wired feater (0.7 contract, 3 verify+secure), bugfixer (3.5 contract from diagnosis, 5 gates), hotfixer (1.7 silent contract, 3 security gate FAILURE=REVERT not loop, +Agent tool). 27 structure locks + full pipeline dogfood: feat fixture w/ SQLi → GATE1 CONFORME → GATE2 BLOCK(1) (checklist caught what semgrep taint missed) → fix → re-verify CONFORME (order invariant) → re-scan PASS. [[BDR-050]] [[LRN-095]]. Weighting held: feat/bugfix nominal 2 dispatches, hotfix 1 + revert-on-fail. INCIDENT: re-committed [[LRN-093]] (2nd recurrence, 4 locks w/ \n) — caught at first run; user flagged advisory-insufficient → build deterministic backstop in lot 5. Next: lot 5 heavy flows (ship-feature enrich-at-gate, init-project +security, onboard no-loop) + escalation dogfood (max-3 STOP) + LRN-093 meta-test guard.
- Chantier verify-loops LOT 5 (feature/verify-loops `1c69de2`, FINAL): ship-feature (0e contract, enrich-at-gate STEP 3 [gated], 5 verify+secure vs ENRICHED) + init-project (contract from BRIEF, enrich GATE#1, 9 verify+secure — adds the security gate it lacked) + onboard (explicit NO-loop, audit≠dev, documented vs symmetry) + lib/tests/no-vacuous-locks.test.sh (LRN-093 deterministic backstop w/ inline flip-test) + loops-heavy 18 locks. Dogfood BOTH vigilance points real: (1) enrich — fresh verifier reads+judges a [gated] design criterion (ECARTS names it); (2) escalation — 3 consecutive ECARTS → orchestrator STOP at max-3 + CONTRACT-vs-REALIZED table, no 4th loop, no commit (first real exercise of the infinite-loop guard). [[BDR-051]] [[LRN-096]]. INCIDENT closed: the backstop's OWN flip-test RED'd (regex missed line-start tf) → fixed → [[LRN-096]] (a guard is code, prove it can fail). Chantier complete: 5 lots on feature/verify-loops, develop+main intact, nothing pushed.