chore(memory): BDR-045 + LRN-084 + LRN-034 corrob — capitalize gitflow aiguillage-standalone

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RNaYKPEkjH1jbgoX1TwKMX

.claude/memory/decisions.md

@@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ rules:
 | BDR-042 | 2026-06-30 | /release-candidate = thin orchestrator over gitflow release; the tag lives in the skill, not the lib | accepted |
 | BDR-043 | 2026-06-30 | BDR-015 trigger cleared — 5 ex-broken gstack symlinks repaired → darwin re-baseline back in scope (unblocked, NOT run) | accepted |
 | BDR-044 | 2026-06-30 | auto-skill-dispatch won't-build — under-routing fear inverted to over-routing by cartography, then measured: model discriminates (clear→route, ambiguous→ask, trivial→abstain) | accepted · won't-build |
+| BDR-045 | 2026-07-01 | Standalone memory/doc skills branch to chore/* via aiguillage (hook exemption kept) | accepted |
 
 ---
 
@@ -680,3 +681,15 @@ rules:
   - Add an over-routing bound (clear→route / ambiguous→ask / trivial→abstain) at L2 → measurement shows the model ALREADY does this; codifying it risks perturbing it, zero upside.
   - Keyword hook on intent verbs → too noisy — the design-hook mis-fired on "design" in "auto-skill-dispatch" 3× this session; intent verbs (corrige/crée) are everywhere.
 - **Reference**: cartography L0–L4 + discernment-RED (user-run, fresh sessions). Subagent under-routing RED RETIRED as non-discriminating ([[LRN-083]]). [[LRN-080]] (measure-first), [[LRN-049]] (bound noise). TODO "auto-skill-dispatch" → won't-build.
+
+## BDR-045 — Standalone memory/doc skills branch to `chore/*` via the aiguillage (hook exemption kept)
+
+- **Date**: 2026-07-01
+- **Status**: accepted
+- **Decision**: Standalone memory/doc skills (`/capitalize` `/close` `/prune-memory` `/reconcile`) run the gitflow aiguillage BEFORE writing: on a protected base they `gitflow start chore <name>` off develop → commit lands on `chore/*`, not direct on main/develop. New `chore` type in `lib/gitflow.sh` (`base_for`→develop, `branch_type`, `finish`→develop like feature/bugfix); hook UNCHANGED (`chore/*` non-protected; the `.claude/**`-on-main exemption KEPT — T3 still green). `gitflow-aiguillage.md` broadened (caller→type map); 3 skills wired (`capitalize` covers `/close` via alias, `prune-memory`, `reconcile`); tests +T1 chore predicates +T6b finish chore→develop +T10 coherence chore/m → 64/64. Reused the EXISTING aiguillage include, not a new mechanism. Commit `e8807a7`.
+- **Why**: the `.claude/**` exemption is scoped to the SIDE-CAR ([[BDR-034]]: memory following a code branch). When memory IS the work (standalone reconcile/prune/capitalize) there is no branch to follow → it fell back to `main`. A multi-repo raccord committed 5 `chore(memory)` direct on `main` and nothing flagged it — the exemption worked as designed, masking the divergence with the "all via branch" rule ([[LRN-084]]). The aiguillage closes the SKILL path without taxing the side-car. The hook can NEVER enforce "from develop" (only "not on a protected base") → that half lives ONLY in `gitflow_start`.
+- **Alternatives rejected**:
+  - (A) remove the `.claude/**` exemption — breaks standalone `/capitalize`+`/close` on main/develop (commit in place, no branch of their own — `memory-commit.sh` has no protected-base guard) AND every side-car commit; over-reaches the leak.
+  - (C) codify exemption + human habit — enforces NOTHING mechanically; goal was automatic.
+  - (D) narrow the exemption by size/scope in the hook — fuzzy, false positives.
+- **Honest residual**: a MANUAL `git commit` of `.claude/**` on `main` still passes — B covers the skill path only. Non-blocking hook WARN on manual `.claude/**`-on-main = DEFERRED. See [[BDR-034]], [[BDR-039]], [[LRN-084]].

.claude/memory/journal.md

@@ -287,3 +287,6 @@ rules:
 - Subagent RED (6 reps, toy tasks) → 0/6 routed → RETIRED as non-discriminating (SUBAGENT-STOP + delegated framing = floor artifact, not signal); did NOT report as a number → [[LRN-083]].
 - Discernment-RED in REAL fresh sessions (user-run, 8 prompts / 3 classes): CLEAR→route ✓, AMBIGUOUS→ask (refuses to guess, investigates for a useful Q) ✓, TRIVIAL→abstain ✓. Over-routing risk does NOT materialize — model balances L1 vs Workflow rules.
 - Verdict: WON'T-BUILD ([[BDR-044]]) — 3rd measured moot of the session (--help, darwin re-baseline, auto-skill-dispatch). LRN-083 capitalized; [[LRN-080]] corroborated (3-in-a-row → measure-first sweep heuristic). TODO auto-skill-dispatch → won't-build. ALL actionables soldés.
+
+## 2026-07-01
+- gitflow aiguillage-standalone (BDR-045): chore type + 4 standalone memory/doc skills branch off develop before writing; hook exemption kept. 64/64 green (e8807a7). Then repaired 5 direct-on-main `chore(memory)` → chore/reconcile-memory branches (LRN-084, LRN-034 corrob).

.claude/memory/learnings.md

@@ -103,6 +103,7 @@ rules:
 | LRN-081 | 2026-06-30 | Claude commit trailers (Co-Authored-By + Claude-Session) only on Claude-COMPOSED content; a commit merely STAGING user-authored text gets none — staging ≠ authorship | committing on the user's behalf; memory-commit.sh appends trailers by default |
 | LRN-082 | 2026-06-30 | Trigger-cleared on a multi-motif exclusion lifts only the named motif — re-check the others before acting | any "exclusion lifted / precondition cleared" — verify ALL grounds, not just the named one |
 | LRN-083 | 2026-06-30 | subagents are an INVALID instrument for measuring main-loop spontaneous routing — SUBAGENT-STOP + delegated framing pin them to the no-route floor | any RED of whether the MAIN loop self-invokes; use fresh main-loop sessions, observe via the human |
+| LRN-084 | 2026-07-01 | protection hook enforces PROD not the full branch-flow; exemption masked the rule-vs-guard divergence | a guard exempts a class / checks one predicate — verify it encodes full intent |
 
 ---
 
@@ -544,6 +545,7 @@ rules:
 - **Pattern**: narrated/remembered state from ANY source (user OR assistant) is not ground truth. Approval of a diff ≠ its application.
 - **Future application**: anyone asserts "X is done" → verify (git log, file content, grep) before building on it; ESPECIALLY when it contradicts your own earlier statement, or after a context/window break. Internal contradiction → stop, re-check git, never reconcile by accepting the newer claim silently.
 - **Reference**: P3 reprise, commit 493b6b9. Linked to [[LRN-032]] (verify before applying a rule), [[LRN-035]] (check the artifact, not the claim/count).
+- **corroboration 2026-07-01**: multi-repo raccord (6 repos) — mapped each repo's REAL git/fs state (read-only cartography) before EVERY write/destructive op, gated per-gap, re-verified each subagent oracle in the main loop. Declared TODO/registry/checkbox drift confirmed repeatedly; the discipline KILLED false simplifications: a blind `master→main` CHANGELOG swap (reflog showed master renamed AWAY, not a live branch), "just remove the `.claude/**` exemption" (would have broken standalone `/capitalize`, [[LRN-084]]), a config supersession grep that failed on a line-wrap (supersession was real). Narrated/declared state ≠ ground truth, at multi-repo scale.
 
 ---
 
@@ -906,3 +908,10 @@ rules:
 - **why it matters**: a 0/N subagent RED reads as "under-triggers → build the chantier" but is the [[LRN-028]] trap — the instrument can't tell strong prose from weak. Concluding from it = a pass/fail for the WRONG reason ([[LRN-074]]/[[LRN-077]]).
 - **context**: 2026-06-30 auto-skill-dispatch RED. 6 subagents on toy implicit-intent tasks → 0/6 routed → RETIRED as non-discriminating, NOT reported as a number. Reframed; measured instead in REAL fresh main-loop sessions.
 - **future application**: measure main-loop spontaneous routing/discernment in FRESH main-loop sessions (full L0–L4, no SUBAGENT-STOP, real user-turn). Observable instrument = the HUMAN typing the prompts + watching live — cron/schedule-spawned fresh sessions are the right CONDITION but UNOBSERVABLE to the orchestrator (they notify the owner, not the dispatcher), so they can't be the measurement vehicle. Never substitute a subagent for a fresh session in a routing RED. See [[LRN-028]], [[LRN-075]], [[LRN-080]].
+
+## LRN-084 — A protection hook enforces PROD safety, not the full branch-flow — the exemption masked the rule-vs-guard divergence
+
+- **Date**: 2026-07-01
+- **pattern**: the gitflow pre-commit hook is a PROTECTION guard (block code on main/develop), NOT a flow enforcer. It exempts `.claude/**` and can only test "on a protected base" — it can NEVER verify "branched FROM develop" (no base knowledge). So "every change via a branch from develop" is only HALF-encoded by the hook; the base half lives solely upstream in `gitflow_start`. The exemption is scoped to the SIDE-CAR ([[BDR-034]]); it has no branch to follow when memory IS the work → standalone memory fell back to `main`.
+- **why it matters**: a multi-repo raccord committed 5 `chore(memory)` direct on `main` and NOTHING flagged it — nothing was violated, the exemption worked as designed. The divergence was guard (declares PROD protection) vs intended rule (all via branch); the exemption MASKED it, the raccord revealed it by violating the unencoded half. A guard encoding only PART of the intent reads as full enforcement — a false-green.
+- **future application**: when a guard exempts a class or checks one predicate, ask what it does NOT encode and whether a human leans on it for MORE than it enforces. Enforce the unencoded half where it actually lives (the aiguillage at skill start, [[BDR-045]]), do not push it into a guard that structurally can't hold it. Verify the guard's real scope against the rule's full scope before trusting "it would have caught it." See [[BDR-034]], [[BDR-045]], [[LRN-034]].