bchanot/claude
1
0
Fork 1
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

feat(bugfix): pass B at FIX PLAN, NEED-DECISION routed on class

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Bastien Chanot
2026-09-16 22:13:16 +02:00
parent 6d9a3497a2
commit 590482b622
1 changed files with 11 additions and 5 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
skills/bugfix/SKILL.md
+11 -5
View File
@@ -116,6 +116,10 @@ RISK: <low/medium — what could go wrong>
obvious fix. obvious fix.
- If the fix is significant (>10 lines, multiple files, - If the fix is significant (>10 lines, multiple files,
behavior change): wait for user approval. behavior change): wait for user approval.
- Then run pass B of `$HOME/.claude/lib/contract-interview.md` against the
FIX PLAN: every VISIBLE / PUBLIC NAME / SCOPE choice it settles that the
bug report left open → one batch of questions, before STEP 3b. The trivial
fast-path is not exempt: a 1-line fix with a visible choice still asks.
## STEP 3b — CHALLENGE THE FIX PLAN (before the contract) ## STEP 3b — CHALLENGE THE FIX PLAN (before the contract)
Unless the fix is the trivial 1-2 line case STEP 3 already fast-paths, the Unless the fix is the trivial 1-2 line case STEP 3 already fast-paths, the
@@ -135,8 +139,8 @@ the STEP 3 approval gate.
Run `$HOME/.claude/lib/contract-interview.md` (main loop). The DIAGNOSIS Run `$HOME/.claude/lib/contract-interview.md` (main loop). The DIAGNOSIS
feeds it: REQUEST verbatim = the bug report as received; ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA feeds it: REQUEST verbatim = the bug report as received; ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA
= the symptom reproduced-then-gone + a regression test present and passing; = the symptom reproduced-then-gone + a regression test present and passing;
FILE SCOPE = the FIX PLAN files. Questions stay proportional (a clear, FILE SCOPE = the FIX PLAN files. Pass A only here (pass B ran at STEP 3); a
reproduced bug → zero). It writes the contract to clear, reproduced bug asks nothing. It writes the contract to
`.claude/tasks/contracts/<date>-<slug>-<HHMM>.md`; keep the path — the `.claude/tasks/contracts/<date>-<slug>-<HHMM>.md`; keep the path — the
executor reads it first and GATE 1 (STEP 6) hands it to a fresh verifier. executor reads it first and GATE 1 (STEP 6) hands it to a fresh verifier.
@@ -162,9 +166,11 @@ ops, no security dispatch. Finish with the BUGFIX-EXEC REPORT."
Parse the `BUGFIX-EXEC REPORT`: Parse the `BUGFIX-EXEC REPORT`:
- `STATUS : DONE` → STEP 6. - `STATUS : DONE` → STEP 6.
- `STATUS : NEED-DECISION` → make the decision HERE (that is reflection), - `STATUS : NEED-DECISION` → route on its `CLASS:` per MID-RUN CLARIFICATION
append it to the plan, re-dispatch a FRESH bugfixer with plan + decision. in `$HOME/.claude/lib/contract-interview.md`: visible / public-name / scope
Max 2 decision round-trips → escalate to the user. → ask the user, verbatim; internal → decide HERE (max 2 such round-trips
→ escalate). Append the answer to the contract `[gated]` and to the plan,
re-dispatch a FRESH bugfixer with plan + decision.
- `STATUS : BLOCKED` → surface the blocker to the user, stop. - `STATUS : BLOCKED` → surface the blocker to the user, stop.
## STEP 6 — VERIFY + SECURE + PRE-COMMIT GATE + COMMIT (main loop, LRN-083) ## STEP 6 — VERIFY + SECURE + PRE-COMMIT GATE + COMMIT (main loop, LRN-083)