feat(model-routing): /feat re-architecture — reflection inline, feater = sonnet executor (partial supersede BDR-050)
This commit is contained in:
+219
-11
@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: feat
|
||||
description: |
|
||||
Small feature implementation (1-5 files). Light planning, direct
|
||||
implementation, no heavy orchestration. For features that don't
|
||||
need the full /ship-feature pipeline (no design brainstorm, no
|
||||
subagents, no plugin check gate).
|
||||
Small feature implementation (1-5 files). Reflection inline (scope,
|
||||
plan, contract — session model), execution dispatched to the
|
||||
sonnet-pinned feater executor. For features that don't need the full
|
||||
/ship-feature pipeline (no design brainstorm, no plugin check gate).
|
||||
Trigger: "feat", "small feature", "add this", "petite feature",
|
||||
"quick feature", "ajoute ca", "implement this small thing".
|
||||
For multi-file features needing design → use /ship-feature.
|
||||
@@ -20,13 +20,221 @@ allowed-tools:
|
||||
- Agent
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
MODEL GATE (blocking): run `$HOME/.claude/lib/model-gate.md` BEFORE loading
|
||||
the agent below. Verdict `small` → STOP — print the gate's remedy, end the
|
||||
turn, do not load the agent.
|
||||
# /feat — small-feature orchestrator (reflection inline, execution dispatched)
|
||||
|
||||
Load and follow strictly:
|
||||
- $HOME/.claude/agents/feater.md
|
||||
|
||||
Execute the FEATER agent on the following target:
|
||||
MODEL GATE (blocking): run `$HOME/.claude/lib/model-gate.md` BEFORE any
|
||||
step below. Verdict `small` → STOP — print the gate's remedy, end the
|
||||
turn, dispatch nothing.
|
||||
|
||||
## REQUEST
|
||||
$ARGUMENTS
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## STEP 0 — SCOPE CHECK
|
||||
|
||||
Before starting, verify this is actually a small feature:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
git status
|
||||
git log --oneline -3
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Read the relevant existing code to understand the context.
|
||||
|
||||
### Decision rules (apply in order — first match wins)
|
||||
|
||||
| Rule | Trigger | Action |
|
||||
|---|---|---|
|
||||
| 1 | Estimated diff < 2 files AND no logic (config value, copy fix, missing field) | DOWNGRADE → load `$HOME/.claude/agents/hotfixer.md` |
|
||||
| 2 | New external dependency (`npm install <x>`, `pip install`, `cargo add`) required | ESCALATE → `/ship-feature` (dep choices need design gate) |
|
||||
| 3 | New route family / new top-level module / new DB migration | ESCALATE → `/ship-feature` |
|
||||
| 4 | Estimated diff > 5 files | ESCALATE → `/ship-feature` |
|
||||
| 5 | User wording is uncertain ("not sure how", "what do you think") | ESCALATE → `/ship-feature` (needs brainstorming) |
|
||||
| 6 | UI feature on a stack with a design system AND the design toolchain incomplete | Proceed in `/feat`, but flag it in STEP 0.5 design gate |
|
||||
| 7 | Otherwise | PROCEED in `/feat` |
|
||||
|
||||
### Worked examples
|
||||
|
||||
- "Add `/health` endpoint returning `{status:"ok",version}`" → 1-2 files, no new dep, route added to existing router → **PROCEED**.
|
||||
- "Add a dark-mode toggle bound to `prefers-color-scheme`" → 2-3 files, design system exists → **PROCEED** (design gate triggers in STEP 0.5).
|
||||
- "Add OAuth login (Google + GitHub providers)" → new deps, new routes, secrets handling → **ESCALATE** to `/ship-feature`.
|
||||
- "Show a 'New' badge on items created this week" → 1-2 files, pure UI predicate → **PROCEED**.
|
||||
- "Fix copy: 'Sign In' → 'Sign in'" in 1 file → **DOWNGRADE** to `/hotfix`.
|
||||
|
||||
Print a one-line scope confirmation (use the rule that fired):
|
||||
```
|
||||
FEAT: <feature name> — rule <N>, ~<N> files, <brief approach>
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## STEP 0.5 — DESIGN GATE
|
||||
|
||||
Follow `$HOME/.claude/lib/design-gate.md`:
|
||||
- Scan $ARGUMENTS and target files for design/UI/style signals.
|
||||
- If signals found → run `design-tool-gate.sh`; if it reports INCOMPLETE,
|
||||
tell the user to run `/profile design` before proceeding.
|
||||
- If no signals → skip (zero overhead).
|
||||
|
||||
## STEP 0.6 — MEMORY READ-BEFORE (decisions-first)
|
||||
|
||||
Run the scan per `$HOME/.claude/lib/analyze-before-plan.md`, decisions-weighted: a BDR may
|
||||
already constrain or forbid the approach; an LRN may name a gotcha to apply. Emit RELATED
|
||||
MEMORY; feed STEP 1 PLAN. Inline consumption — reader = planner, no injection.
|
||||
`.claude/memory/` absent → guarded no-op (zero overhead on a memory-less repo).
|
||||
|
||||
## STEP 0.7 — CONTRACT
|
||||
|
||||
Run `$HOME/.claude/lib/contract-interview.md` (main loop — you are it). It
|
||||
captures the request verbatim, asks 0-3 questions PROPORTIONAL to ambiguity
|
||||
(a complete request → zero questions, silent), derives testable acceptance
|
||||
criteria + file scope, and writes the contract to
|
||||
`.claude/tasks/contracts/<date>-<slug>-<HHMM>.md`. Keep the path — the
|
||||
executor reads it first and GATE 1 (STEP 4) hands it to a fresh verifier.
|
||||
|
||||
## STEP 1 — PLAN (dispatch-ready)
|
||||
|
||||
The executor follows this plan to the letter and CANNOT ask questions —
|
||||
close every decision here:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Files to create or modify (with line references).
|
||||
2. Approach in 2-5 bullets — name every choice (naming, data shape, API
|
||||
surface); an open choice left here comes back as a NEED-DECISION
|
||||
round-trip.
|
||||
3. Edge cases to handle.
|
||||
4. Tests to add/update (exact files).
|
||||
5. Disposition (from STEP 0.6): name each in-force BDR/LRN this plan honors
|
||||
(`honors BDR-xxx by …`), or state `no in-force decision constrains this feature`.
|
||||
A plan with neither = read-then-ignore; the disposition must surface as a trace.
|
||||
|
||||
Print the plan as a compact checklist:
|
||||
```
|
||||
PLAN:
|
||||
[ ] <file> — <what to do>
|
||||
[ ] <file> — <what to do>
|
||||
[ ] <test file> — <test to add>
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
If the approach is ambiguous: ask the user ONE focused question BEFORE
|
||||
dispatching — never after (the executor cannot relay questions).
|
||||
|
||||
## STEP 2 — BRANCH
|
||||
|
||||
**Gitflow aiguillage (before dispatch):** follow `$HOME/.claude/lib/gitflow-aiguillage.md`
|
||||
— your type = `feature`. On `main`/`develop` it branches first; on a working
|
||||
branch it's a no-op (commit in place). Never `finish`.
|
||||
|
||||
## STEP 3 — DISPATCH EXECUTOR
|
||||
|
||||
Dispatch the executor — sonnet by frontmatter pin, do not override:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Agent(subagent_type="feater")
|
||||
prompt: "CONTRACT: <path from STEP 0.7>
|
||||
PLAN: <the STEP 1 checklist + approach bullets + edge cases, verbatim>
|
||||
BRANCH: <current branch — verify with git branch --show-current, never switch>
|
||||
Implement the plan to the letter. Tests alongside code. No commit, no
|
||||
branch ops, no new dependencies, no files outside the contract FILE SCOPE.
|
||||
Finish with the FEAT-EXEC REPORT."
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Parse the `FEAT-EXEC REPORT`:
|
||||
- `STATUS : DONE` → STEP 4.
|
||||
- `STATUS : NEED-DECISION` → make the decision HERE (that is reflection),
|
||||
append it to the plan, re-dispatch a FRESH feater with plan + decision.
|
||||
Max 2 decision round-trips → escalate to the user.
|
||||
- `STATUS : BLOCKED` → surface the blocker to the user, stop.
|
||||
|
||||
## STEP 4 — VERIFY + SECURE (fresh gates, bounded loops)
|
||||
|
||||
Run the two fresh gates per `$HOME/.claude/lib/verify-secure-loop.md` with
|
||||
`CONTRACT` = the STEP 0.7 path, `DIFF` = the working-tree diff the executor
|
||||
produced, `TEST` = the suite named in its report:
|
||||
|
||||
- GATE 1 — a FRESH verifier judges the diff against the contract (blind).
|
||||
CONFORME on the first pass → straight to GATE 2, no loop. ECARTS → the
|
||||
"dev" of the loop is the dispatched executor: re-dispatch a FRESH feater
|
||||
with the CONTRACT path + the exact gap lines, nothing else. Max 3 →
|
||||
escalate.
|
||||
- GATE 2 — a FRESH security-auditor (`MODE: gate`) scans the diff. PASS →
|
||||
STEP 5. BLOCK → re-dispatch a FRESH feater with the BLOCKING list + the
|
||||
CONTRACT path; re-verify the request THEN re-scan, max 3 → escalate.
|
||||
|
||||
Loop decisions stay HERE, in the main loop (LRN-083). Nominal (clear
|
||||
request, conform first pass, clean diff) = one executor + one
|
||||
verifier + one security dispatch.
|
||||
|
||||
## STEP 5 — COMMIT
|
||||
|
||||
Commit using conventional format:
|
||||
```
|
||||
feat(<scope>): <what was added>
|
||||
|
||||
<brief description of the feature>
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
If the feature touched multiple concerns (e.g., feature + config +
|
||||
test), consider splitting into 2-3 atomic commits — load
|
||||
`$HOME/.claude/agents/commit-changer.md` and follow its grouping logic.
|
||||
|
||||
Print summary:
|
||||
```
|
||||
FEAT COMPLETE
|
||||
FEATURE : <name>
|
||||
FILE(S) : <created/modified files>
|
||||
TEST(S) : <added tests>
|
||||
VERIFIED : <what was checked>
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## STEP 6 — DOC SYNC (automatic)
|
||||
|
||||
Load `$HOME/.claude/agents/doc-syncer.md`.
|
||||
Execute in automatic mode:
|
||||
`auto-mode scope: <list of files modified during this session>`
|
||||
|
||||
**Then commit the docs** — follow `$HOME/.claude/lib/doc-commit.md`: it surgically commits
|
||||
ONLY the files doc-syncer patched (its `PATCHED_FILES` output), never `git add -A`, never
|
||||
`.claude/`/`CLAUDE.md` (rc 4 = a loud BDR-022 anomaly, not a silent skip), and no-ops when
|
||||
nothing was patched — the common case for a trivial change. No FINISH in an inline flow, so
|
||||
it just commits the docs on the current branch (no ordering concern).
|
||||
|
||||
## STEP 7 — CAPITALIZE (memory registries)
|
||||
|
||||
A small feature may or may not involve a design choice. Scan the work for:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Non-trivial design choice** (even small: a library pick, a naming convention, a data-model tradeoff) → propose `BDR-XXX` in `.claude/memory/decisions.md` with alternatives considered.
|
||||
- **Reusable pattern or gotcha encountered** → propose `LRN-XXX` in `.claude/memory/learnings.md`.
|
||||
|
||||
Present the candidates grouped:
|
||||
```
|
||||
CAPITALIZE — proposé
|
||||
[decisions.md] BDR-XXX — <titre> (optionnel)
|
||||
[learnings.md] LRN-XXX — <pattern> (optionnel)
|
||||
Valider ? (all / <IDs> / edit / skip)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Always append a 1-line entry to today's heading in `.claude/memory/journal.md`.
|
||||
|
||||
**Language rule**: written entries are ALWAYS in English (see CLAUDE.md "Memory registries" § Language). The interactive gate may mirror the user's language; the appended entries must not.
|
||||
|
||||
If no substantive capture candidate → skip with `CAPITALIZE: nothing to log`.
|
||||
|
||||
**Then commit the memory** — follow `$HOME/.claude/lib/capitalize-commit.md`: it
|
||||
surgically commits what capitalize just wrote (`.claude/memory` + `.claude/tasks`
|
||||
only, never `git add -A`) as one `chore(memory)` commit, reports the memory-commit
|
||||
hash, and no-ops if nothing was written.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## RULES
|
||||
- Max 5 files. If more needed → `/ship-feature`.
|
||||
- Reflection (scope, plan, contract, loop decisions) NEVER leaves this main
|
||||
loop; execution NEVER stays in it — the executor is the sonnet-pinned
|
||||
feater subagent (BDR-066).
|
||||
- The executor is dispatched FRESH on every round-trip — feedback travels
|
||||
as contract path + named gaps/decisions, never as transcript.
|
||||
- Design gate only (not full plugin check). See STEP 0.5.
|
||||
- No brainstorm/design phase (if needed → `/ship-feature`).
|
||||
- Keep scope tight. If scope creep happens mid-work, stop
|
||||
and suggest splitting into `/feat` + follow-up task.
|
||||
- Follow existing code patterns. Don't introduce new patterns
|
||||
for a small feature.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user