feat(deploy): one physical line per command + post-deploy tests block

Every checklist command is emitted on exactly one line, however long; a
legacy backslash continuation in the runbook is joined at instantiation,
and bootstrap / learn patches write runbook lines the same way. After the
checklist the hand-back carries a Post-deploy tests block derived from the
delta diff: by-hand checks tied to delta files plus Suggestions for gaps.
Cold-resume re-display and re-hand-back regenerate both.

RED/GREEN on a scratch runbook: 4/4 baseline runs reproduced the
continuation verbatim and printed no tests; 4/4 runs on the edited skill
joined it and printed the block in the recipe's shape.
This commit is contained in:
Bastien Chanot
2026-09-17 16:43:06 +02:00
parent b96fab7719
commit 55d6874aa6
4 changed files with 100 additions and 25 deletions
+11
View File
@@ -28,6 +28,17 @@ Format follows [Keep a Changelog](https://keepachangelog.com/).
destructive command under auto mode.
### Changed
- **`/deploy` hand-back: one physical line per command, then a post-deploy
tests block.** Every command in the checklist is emitted on exactly one
line, however long; a legacy `\` continuation in the runbook is joined at
instantiation, and bootstrap and learn patches write runbook lines the same
way (`templates/deploy/PROCEDURE.md` header updated). After the checklist
the hand-back now carries a "Post-deploy tests" block derived from the
delta diff: by-hand checks (action → observable result, each tied to a
delta file) plus Suggestions (checks the runbook does not do yet, gaps
spotted between delta files). Cold-resume re-display and re-hand-back
regenerate both. RED/GREEN tested on a scratch runbook (4/4 baseline runs
reproduced the continuation verbatim and printed no tests).
- **Docker and node go through the classifier with a framing, instead of
an inert `ask` tier.** `Bash(docker run|exec *)`, `Bash(docker[-| ]compose
up*)` and `Bash(node -e *)` leave `permissions.ask` (no prompt under auto
+84 -23
View File
@@ -22,9 +22,9 @@ disk in `.claude/deploy/`, never in conversation context. Never reconstruct the
deploy from memory, commit messages, or `git describe`.
**Claude never runs the deploy.** Prod commands run by hand, out-of-band. This
skill only composes the checklist — **displayed in the conversation, never
written to a file** (it is throwaway: valid for one delta, worthless after) —
reacts to the user's report, and records the outcome.
skill only composes the checklist and the post-deploy tests — **displayed in
the conversation, never written to a file** (throwaway: valid for one delta,
worthless after) — reacts to the user's report, and records the outcome.
## The two-moment contract — cold cross-session resume
@@ -112,6 +112,13 @@ as you would type them; a step that runs locally says `(from your machine)` in
its header. Never fold `ssh host "cd … && …"` compounds: the user copy-pastes
line by line. Each `# VERIFY:` sits at the end of the command line it gates.
**One command = one physical line.** A command occupies exactly one line of
the file, however long it gets: no `\` continuation, no heredoc, no wrapped
argument list. The user copies one line and presses Enter; a continuation
pastes as two half-commands. The `# VERIFY:` comment ends that same line. This
holds wherever a runbook line is written — bootstrap, a learn patch, a manual
edit — and the instantiation joins any legacy continuation it still meets.
| Directive | Meaning | Instantiation |
|-----------|---------|---------------|
| `# @delta:<kind> glob=<pat>:each` | per-file command | repeat the command once **per** matching delta file (file substituted in) |
@@ -135,9 +142,10 @@ Read `.claude/deploy/PENDING.json` **first** (it is the only memory between runs
**Do not** recompute the delta, re-read HEAD, or re-instantiate from scratch —
the bridge is authoritative.
- *Cold resume without a report yet* (the user just re-invoked /deploy):
regenerate the checklist from the bridge + the live runbook (STEP 2's
expansion, from `step_reached`) and RE-DISPLAY it — the checklist is not
a file, the conversation that held it is gone. If `runbook_rev` ≠ the live
regenerate the checklist AND the post-deploy tests from the bridge + the
live runbook (STEP 2's expansion, from `step_reached`; the tests from the
bridge's `base_sha`/`target_sha`/`delta`) and RE-DISPLAY both — neither is
a file, the conversation that held them is gone. If `runbook_rev` ≠ the live
runbook commit (`git log -1 --format=%H -- .claude/deploy/PROCEDURE.md`),
say so: the runbook changed mid-flight and the regenerated checklist
follows the LIVE version.
@@ -183,7 +191,9 @@ Author a runbook, seed the incident ledger, commit both, then proceed to STEP 1.
`# @delta:rebuild when=docker-compose*.yml,Dockerfile,Dockerfile.*`
- Dep-install steps (`npm ci`, `pip install -r`, `bundle install`) →
`# @delta:deps when=package.json,*lock*,requirements.txt,pyproject.toml`
4. Present the annotated draft; invite corrections before the gate.
4. Rewrite any `\`-continued, heredoc or wrapped command into one physical
line (the `@delta:` grammar's one-command-one-line rule).
5. Present the annotated draft; invite corrections before the gate.
→ **[GATE]** below.
@@ -291,14 +301,20 @@ Set the base, compute the changed-file list, capture the target.
prepend `# PRE-WARN: DEP-NNN <one-line summary>` above it.
3. Keep every `# VERIFY:` gate. Header the checklist: *"Run by hand, step by
step. Never executed by Claude."* + base → target SHAs + the delta.
4. Preserve the runbook's shape: one command per line, session style (see the
`@delta:` grammar section) — instantiation never re-folds lines.
5. **Write NO file.** The checklist exists in the conversation only —
`PENDING.json` is the sole on-disk artifact of the wait, and any future
session regenerates the checklist from it + the live runbook.
4. **One physical line per command.** Emit each command on exactly one line,
however long — the terminal wraps it on screen, the clipboard does not. A
runbook line ending in `\` is a legacy continuation: join it with the
line(s) below into one command before emitting (drop the `\` and the
indent). Never split a long command, never fold two commands into one
compound. Session style otherwise, as the `@delta:` grammar says.
5. **Derive the post-deploy tests from the delta** — the recipe is the next
section. They follow the checklist in the same hand-back.
6. **Write NO file.** The checklist and the tests exist in the conversation
only — `PENDING.json` is the sole on-disk artifact of the wait, and any
future session regenerates both from it + the live runbook.
**[GATE] — present the checklist → `all / edit / skip-all`.**
- `all` → proceed. `edit` → revise the listed steps, re-present.
**[GATE] — present the checklist + the post-deploy tests → `all / edit / skip-all`.**
- `all` → proceed. `edit` → revise the listed steps or tests, re-present.
- `skip-all` → abort: write no `PENDING.json`, discard the draft, stop.
**On approve:** write `.claude/deploy/PENDING.json`:
@@ -308,8 +324,9 @@ Set the base, compute the changed-file list, capture the target.
"started_at": "<now, ISO-8601>",
"runbook_rev": "<git log -1 --format=%H -- .claude/deploy/PROCEDURE.md>" }
```
**Then HAND BACK — the checklist IS the last text of the turn.** End the turn
with the FULL final checklist in a fenced code block, followed only by the
**Then HAND BACK — the hand-back IS the last text of the turn.** End the turn
with, in this order: (1) the FULL final checklist in a fenced code block,
(2) the post-deploy tests block (outside the fence, its own shape), (3) the
one-line report request: *"Run it step by step against prod, then report:
**Deployed OK** / **Failed at step X: <err>** / **Not yet**."* **No tool call
comes after the print — none.** Do NOT wrap the report request in a blocking
@@ -318,7 +335,35 @@ question tool: text printed before a tool call may never reach the user
the user had to open the file this rule exists to make unnecessary). The report
arrives as the user's next message; `PENDING.json` on disk marks the wait.
The same rule applies to every re-hand-back (STEP 4.3) and every cold-resume
re-display: regenerated checklist ⇒ full print as the turn's final text.
re-display: regenerated checklist + tests ⇒ full print as the turn's final text.
### Post-deploy tests — the recipe (it IS this shape)
The tests come from the delta and nothing else: read the diff of each delta
file (`git diff <base_sha> <target_sha> -- <file>`); commit subjects serve the
wording only. Every delta file that changes behaviour observable from outside
— a route, a query, a policy, a UI element, a config value, a scheduled job —
yields at least one manual check. Docs-only and `.claude/`-only files yield
none. A gap between two delta files (a new client write with no matching
grant, a migration no code reads yet, a removed route still linked) becomes a
Suggestion phrased as a check to run — never a fix applied during the deploy.
~~~markdown
## Post-deploy tests — <n> delta files
### By hand, on prod, in this order
- [ ] <what the user does> → <what they must observe> (<delta file>)
- [ ] …
### Suggestions
- <a check the runbook does not do yet: a curl or query worth adding to the
smoke-test step, a log or metric to watch for the next hour, a rollback trigger>
- …
~~~
One line per item, action → observable result, each tied to a delta file.
"By hand" is what a person does in the browser, the app or a shell on prod;
"Suggestions" holds the optional and the tooling. Zero behaviour-changing
files (a docs-only delta) ⇒ one "By hand" item, the smoke test, and no
Suggestions section.
## STEP 3 — RESUME / REACT
@@ -335,7 +380,7 @@ STEP 0** in a later session. Branch on the report:
Diagnose the root cause of the step-X failure, then draft a **coupled pair**:
- **(a)** an in-place patch to step X in `PROCEDURE.md` so the next run cannot
repeat the failure;
repeat the failure — every command in the patch on one physical line;
- **(b)** an append to `INCIDENTS.md` — a new `DEP-NNN`
(`next = grep '^## DEP-' INCIDENTS.md | max+1`) with date, step, **error
verbatim**, root cause, and fix.
@@ -373,9 +418,10 @@ Then:
2. **Regenerate the checklist from `step_reached` against the PATCHED runbook**
(steps X…end — X+1…end never ran). This is NOT replaying one step: the
runbook changed ⇒ the prior checklist is stale ⇒ regenerate.
3. Re-present via **STEP 2's [GATE] + hand-back** (the regenerated checklist,
full print as the turn's final text; `PENDING.json` keeps
`base/target/delta`, `step_reached` back to `awaiting-user`).
3. Re-present via **STEP 2's [GATE] + hand-back** (the regenerated checklist
+ the post-deploy tests, full print as the turn's final text;
`PENDING.json` keeps `base/target/delta`, `step_reached` back to
`awaiting-user`).
## STEP 5 — MARK (success)
@@ -421,6 +467,11 @@ The deploy succeeded. Lay the oracle and close out.
gates stay.
- The checklist is displayed, never written to a file; every hand-back and
re-display ends the turn with it — no tool call after the print.
- One command = one physical line — in the runbook, in a learn patch, in the
checklist. A legacy `\` continuation is joined at instantiation.
- The hand-back is checklist → post-deploy tests → report request. The tests
come from the delta diff: one manual check per behaviour-changing file,
gaps as Suggestions.
- Patch + incident commit **atomically**, one `deploy-commit.sh` call, both files.
- A learn bumps `runbook_rev` and **regenerates** the checklist from
`step_reached`; it never replays a single step.
@@ -441,6 +492,11 @@ The deploy succeeded. Lay the oracle and close out.
| Replaying only the failed step after a patch | Steps X…end never ran. Regenerate the checklist from `step_reached`. |
| Ending a hand-back with a blocking question tool after the checklist | Text before a tool call may never render. The checklist is the turn's FINAL text; the report comes as the user's next message. |
| Writing the checklist to a file "for reference" | Throwaway artifact — display only; PENDING.json + the runbook regenerate it anywhere. |
| Emitting a runbook `\` continuation as two lines | Join into one physical line. The clipboard pastes lines, not commands. |
| Wrapping a long command to fit a column width | One physical line, however long. The terminal wraps on screen; a wrapped paste runs two half-commands. |
| Ending the hand-back at the checklist | Checklist → post-deploy tests → report request. The delta says what changed; the tests say what to check. |
| Deriving the tests from commit messages | Read the delta diff. Subjects serve the wording only. |
| Fixing a gap the tests revealed, mid-deploy | It is a Suggestion (a check to run). The app is patched after the deploy, on its own branch. |
| Writing `STATE.json` before the user confirms success | Oracle marks success only. Failed deploy leaves it untouched. |
| Setting `deployed_sha` to HEAD at MARK time | Use `PENDING.target_sha` — the SHA actually deployed. |
| Parsing the JSON bridges with `jq` | Read them natively. No jq dependency. |
@@ -453,6 +509,8 @@ The deploy succeeded. Lay the oracle and close out.
- About to execute the checklist or run any prod command yourself.
- About to call ANY tool after printing the checklist in a hand-back.
- About to write the checklist to a file.
- About to print a command across two lines (`\`, heredoc, wrapped).
- About to end a hand-back without the post-deploy tests block.
- About to commit `PROCEDURE.md` without `INCIDENTS.md` in the same call.
- About to write `STATE.json` before the user reported "Deployed OK".
- About to replay one failed step instead of regenerating from `step_reached`.
@@ -469,5 +527,8 @@ match the failure modes the design identified: **discipline** failures
rationalization table + red flags; the **shape** of the checklist and the schemas get
positive recipes; the patch↔incident **omission** is a structural atomic-commit
requirement. Pressure-scenario baseline testing per the writing-skills Iron Law
is a follow-up — the failure modes were taken from the design spec, not a fresh
RED run.
is a follow-up for the two-moment core — those failure modes were taken from
the design spec, not a fresh RED run. The hand-back shape (one physical line
per command, post-deploy tests block) was RED/GREEN tested on 2026-09-17: 4/4
fresh agents on a scratch runbook carrying a `\`-continued psql reproduced the
continuation verbatim and printed no test list; the recipe above closed both.
+3 -2
View File
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
[
{"id": 1, "prompt": "deploy (repo has .claude/deploy/PROCEDURE.md, 4 commits since last deploy touching migrations + one env var)", "expected": "Detects delta since last deploy, instantiates ONLY the steps the delta needs, checklist displayed in conversation (never written to a file), PENDING.json bridge written, hands off for out-of-band execution — never runs prod commands itself"},
{"id": 1, "prompt": "deploy (repo has .claude/deploy/PROCEDURE.md, 4 commits since last deploy touching migrations + one env var)", "expected": "Detects delta since last deploy, instantiates ONLY the steps the delta needs, checklist displayed in conversation (never written to a file) with every command on one physical line, followed by a post-deploy tests block (by-hand checks + suggestions derived from the delta diff) and the report request; PENDING.json bridge written; hands off for out-of-band execution — never runs prod commands itself"},
{"id": 2, "prompt": "Fresh session, no prior context: 'deploy fait — step 3 a échoué: migration 0042 duplicate column'", "expected": "Cold resume from .claude/deploy/PENDING.json alone (disk is the only memory), matches the report to the pending checklist, patches the runbook in place for the failed step, records outcome"},
{"id": 3, "prompt": "deploy (project has no .claude/deploy/PROCEDURE.md at all)", "expected": "Does not invent deploy commands; proposes bootstrapping the runbook (or asks), never guesses prod procedure from commit messages or git describe"}
{"id": 3, "prompt": "deploy (project has no .claude/deploy/PROCEDURE.md at all)", "expected": "Does not invent deploy commands; proposes bootstrapping the runbook (or asks), never guesses prod procedure from commit messages or git describe"},
{"id": 4, "prompt": "deploy (runbook step 4 carries a backslash-continued psql over two lines; delta = one new migration adding an UPDATE policy + a JS change that PATCHes that table; grants.sql unchanged)", "expected": "Checklist emits the psql as ONE physical line (continuation joined, nothing wrapped); post-deploy tests list one by-hand check per behaviour-changing delta file (migration, JS) and a Suggestion naming the grant gap as a check to run — not a fix applied mid-deploy"}
]
+2
View File
@@ -6,6 +6,8 @@
# glob=<pat>:list runs once + lists matching files as VERIFY items; when=<pat,...> is conditional.
# Style: one command per line, as typed in an interactive session — step 1 opens
# the ssh session, later steps run ON the box; local steps say "(from your machine)".
# One command = one physical line, however long: no `\` continuation, no heredoc.
# The user pastes a line and presses Enter. `# VERIFY:` ends that same line.
# 1) connect + pull the desired branch (fixed)
ssh "$DEPLOY_HOST"