feat(seo/geo): CMS plugin-first + shared-file edit discipline + Bing/IndexNow mandatory
Post-review hardening of the parallel seo+geo dispatch: - skills/seo/SKILL.md: shared-file edit discipline embedded in both dispatch prompts (Edit-only on shared templates, Write only on sole-owned files). CROSS-AGENT NOTES flow clarified — dispatcher escalates to SEO.md §11 as user action with automation options (Option B). - agents/seo-analyzer.md: STEP 2 detects 8 CMS (WordPress/Drupal/Magento/Shopify/Joomla/PrestaShop/Ghost/Wix-Squarespace-Webflow) and presence of SEO plugins. STEP 10 emits P0 quick win "install CMS plugin" when CMS detected without plugin. STEP 5 expands topic clusters / silos sémantiques. Framework notes in STEP 12 cover all 8 CMS explicitly. - agents/geo-analyzer.md: STEP 6 checks /faq path + FAQPage schema presence. STEP 11 mandates 3 AI-index user actions per FULL audit (Bing Webmaster Tools / GSC / IndexNow) + Apple Business Connect for local business. - agents/resources/automation-catalog.md: new structured CMS plugin section (install links + pricing per platform). AI-index submission section rewritten with Bing Webmaster as canonical entry for ChatGPT Search/Copilot/DuckDuckGo, IndexNow protocol details, Brave Web Discovery, Apple Business Connect. - agents/resources/llms-txt-template.md: explicit note that /ai.txt and /about-data are NOT real standards; llms.txt (Jeremy Howard) remains the only proposed one. Rationale: third-party AI review of the skill surfaced 5 gaps — race condition on shared templates (Layout.astro holds meta + JSON-LD), ambiguous cross-agent flow, missing CMS-plugin-first logic (Gemini), under-exposed Bing Webmaster (ChatGPT Search channel), and minor accuracy items. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
co-authored by
Claude Opus 4.7
parent
95347d2e47
commit
476195978e
@@ -7,6 +7,12 @@
|
||||
extract content via `/llms.txt`. A Search Engine Land study (2025) found
|
||||
8 of 9 sites saw no measurable traffic change after adoption.
|
||||
|
||||
**Not to be confused with `/ai.txt`**: some blog posts and AI-generated
|
||||
articles recommend a file named `/ai.txt` or `/about-data`. These are
|
||||
NOT real standards — no spec exists, no AI engine reads them. If someone
|
||||
asks about `/ai.txt`, the correct answer is "use `llms.txt` instead, it
|
||||
is the only emerging proposed standard (Jeremy Howard, Sept 2024)".
|
||||
|
||||
**Why include it anyway**:
|
||||
- Low cost (small static file).
|
||||
- Real value for developer-facing sites — AI coding assistants (Cursor,
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user