fix(model-routing): keep commit grouping on the sonnet subagent (edit<n> re-dispatches; /feat routes to /commit-change)
This commit is contained in:
@@ -75,9 +75,10 @@ AskUserQuestion:
|
||||
- `all` → every step in the plan is approved as-is.
|
||||
- `<numbers>` (e.g. `1,3`) → only those steps are approved; the rest stay
|
||||
uncommitted for a later run.
|
||||
- `edit <n>` → collect the corrected message/grouping for step N from the
|
||||
user, redraw the plan (this dispatcher owns the text, no re-dispatch
|
||||
needed), show it again and re-ask.
|
||||
- `edit <n>` → re-dispatch `commit-changer` with `MODE: propose` and the
|
||||
user's correction for step N folded into the prompt, so all grouping /
|
||||
message judgment stays on the sonnet subagent (never redrawn inline on
|
||||
the session model); show the redrawn plan and re-ask.
|
||||
- `skip` → exit cleanly, no commits created, no `MODE: apply` dispatch.
|
||||
|
||||
## STEP 3 — Gate 2: capitalize approval
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -173,8 +173,10 @@ feat(<scope>): <what was added>
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
If the feature touched multiple concerns (e.g., feature + config +
|
||||
test), consider splitting into 2-3 atomic commits — load
|
||||
`$HOME/.claude/agents/commit-changer.md` and follow its grouping logic.
|
||||
test), consider splitting into 2-3 atomic commits grouped by logical
|
||||
unit — or run `/commit-change` on the pending work (it dispatches the
|
||||
sonnet commit-changer; never inline-load the bare agent, it is now a
|
||||
propose/apply executor).
|
||||
|
||||
Print summary:
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user