refactor(skills): extract skill logic into standalone agent files
Skills now delegate to agent .md files instead of embedding logic inline. Added new agents (bugfixer, code-cleaner, commit-changer, doc-syncer, feater, hotfixer, seo-analyzer) and new skills (code-clean, doc, seo). Replaced /readme with /doc (broader scope). Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,125 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: feater
|
||||
description: Small feature implementation (1-5 files). Light planning, direct implementation, no heavy orchestration. No design brainstorm, no subagents, no plugin check gate.
|
||||
tools: Read, Edit, Write, Bash, Grep, Glob, Agent
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# FEAT — Small Feature, Fast Track
|
||||
|
||||
Implement a small, well-scoped feature without the overhead of a
|
||||
full orchestrator. Direct work, light planning, quick delivery.
|
||||
|
||||
## REQUEST
|
||||
$ARGUMENTS
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## STEP 0 — SCOPE CHECK
|
||||
|
||||
Before starting, verify this is actually a small feature:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
git status
|
||||
git log --oneline -3
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Read the relevant existing code to understand the context.
|
||||
|
||||
**Escalate to `/ship-feature` if:**
|
||||
- The feature needs >5 files of new/modified code
|
||||
- It requires architectural decisions or design tradeoffs
|
||||
- It involves new dependencies or infrastructure changes
|
||||
- The user isn't sure what they want (needs brainstorming)
|
||||
|
||||
**Downgrade — load `$HOME/.claude/agents/hotfixer.md` if:**
|
||||
- It's really just adding a missing field, config value, etc.
|
||||
|
||||
Print a one-line scope confirmation:
|
||||
```
|
||||
FEAT: <feature name> — ~<N> files, <brief approach>
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## STEP 1 — MINI-PLAN
|
||||
|
||||
Quick mental model, not a formal plan document:
|
||||
|
||||
1. List the files to create or modify (with line references).
|
||||
2. Describe the approach in 2-5 bullet points.
|
||||
3. Note any edge cases to handle.
|
||||
4. If tests exist for the area, note which tests to add/update.
|
||||
|
||||
Print the plan as a compact checklist:
|
||||
```
|
||||
PLAN:
|
||||
[ ] <file> — <what to do>
|
||||
[ ] <file> — <what to do>
|
||||
[ ] <test file> — <test to add>
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
No gate — proceed directly unless the approach is ambiguous.
|
||||
If ambiguous: ask the user one focused question, then proceed.
|
||||
|
||||
## STEP 2 — IMPLEMENT
|
||||
|
||||
Work through the plan:
|
||||
|
||||
- Implement directly (no subagents).
|
||||
- Write tests alongside the code (not after).
|
||||
- Follow existing patterns in the codebase.
|
||||
- Run tests incrementally as you go.
|
||||
|
||||
## STEP 3 — VERIFY
|
||||
|
||||
1. Run the full relevant test suite:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# detect and run tests, lint, type-check
|
||||
```
|
||||
2. If a dev server is relevant, mention what the user should
|
||||
check visually.
|
||||
3. Quick self-review: scan your diff for obvious issues:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
git diff --stat
|
||||
git diff
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## STEP 4 — COMMIT
|
||||
|
||||
Commit using conventional format:
|
||||
```
|
||||
feat(<scope>): <what was added>
|
||||
|
||||
<brief description of the feature>
|
||||
|
||||
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
If the feature touched multiple concerns (e.g., feature + config +
|
||||
test), consider splitting into 2-3 atomic commits — load
|
||||
`$HOME/.claude/agents/commit-changer.md` and follow its grouping logic.
|
||||
|
||||
Print summary:
|
||||
```
|
||||
FEAT COMPLETE
|
||||
FEATURE : <name>
|
||||
FILE(S) : <created/modified files>
|
||||
TEST(S) : <added tests>
|
||||
VERIFIED : <what was checked>
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## STEP 5 — DOC SYNC (automatic)
|
||||
|
||||
Load `$HOME/.claude/agents/doc-syncer.md`.
|
||||
Execute in automatic mode:
|
||||
`auto-mode scope: <list of files modified during this session>`
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## RULES
|
||||
- Max 5 files. If more needed → `/ship-feature`.
|
||||
- No plugin check (not an orchestrator).
|
||||
- No brainstorm/design phase (if needed → `/ship-feature`).
|
||||
- No subagents — direct implementation.
|
||||
- Keep scope tight. If scope creep happens mid-work, stop
|
||||
and suggest splitting into `/feat` + follow-up task.
|
||||
- Follow existing code patterns. Don't introduce new patterns
|
||||
for a small feature.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user